‘Alien corpses’ presented in Mexico Congress for second time with new evidence of their authenticity – Times of India
NEW DELHI: For the second time, alien hunters have presented mummified ‘alien’ bodies to Mexico’s Congress, along with new evidence intended to establish their authenticity. During this session, controversial UFO enthusiast and journalist Jaime Maussan introduced several doctors who asserted that the corpses were indeed from once-living beings, and some experts claimed to have examined ‘five similar specimens over four years, as reported by the Daily Mail.
New photographs and X-rays were shared with Congress on Tuesday, with the researchers arguing that these images prove that ‘they are real’.The specialists also pointed out that the bodies contained hybrid DNA.
Jaime Maussan said, ‘We have a hybrid being, we have other beings that are apparently more evolved than us…we are facing something truly extraordinary’. While Mausaan and his team declared the corpses, named Clara and Mauricio, ‘are real,’ but the experts did not have anything to substantiate their origin and they did not imply the bodies were ‘extraterrestrial.’
During the session on Tuesday, Maussan concentrated on demonstrating the authenticity of the bodies by presenting insights from medical experts.
‘None of the scientists say [the study results] prove that they are extraterrestrials, but I go further,’ Maussan said, suggesting that they could be evidence of extraterrestrial life forms.
Maussan brought a team of medical experts who delivered a letter signed by 11 researchers from San Luis Gonzaga National University in Ica, Peru, affirming the same conclusion.
Anthropologist Roger Zuniga of San Luis Gonzaga National University in Ica Peru said, ‘There was absolutely no human intervention in the physical and biological formation of these beings.’ Nonetheless, the letter explicitly stated that the team was not suggesting that the bodies were ‘extraterrestrial’ but did not provide information on the origins of the remains.
Argentine surgeon Celestino Adolfo Piotto asserted that he had examined the test results on the bodies and made the unusual argument that ‘they were an evolved version of today’s human beings, calling them ‘our descendants.’
While Maussan remained firm in his claims, the presentation faced criticism from numerous experts who dismissed it as a publicity stunt. These experts referred to previous studies of such remains, which were determined to be crafted from animal and human bones. When questioned about these studies, Zuniga suggested that those specimens were likely fake. However, he reiterated that he and other researchers at the university had examined similar specimens, which they believed to be authentic. During the second forum on extraterrestrial life, legislator Cynthia López (PRI) expressed her indignation at the ‘spectacle’ in Congress.
‘We see Jaime Maussan here in the Chamber of Deputies. Sir, we are discussing the budget; it is not for you to come and do your lies and your things,’ López said. ‘This is the people’s house; we are discussing the budget. They haven’t given a single peso to Acapulco, and you are visiting here. We do not want Jaime Maussan in the Chamber of Deputies. Jaime Maussan out with his lies, there are priorities in the Chamber of Deputies, which is the budget for Acapulco.’
In September, Maussan and some Mexican lawmakers became the target of international mockery when he unveiled two boxes containing what were claimed to be mummies discovered in Peru. The researchers made extravagant assertions that the bodies, presented in transparent boxes and reportedly recovered from Cusco in Peru, were not connected to ‘our earthly evolution,’ and that 30 percent of their genetic makeup remained ‘unknown,’ as reported by Mexican media.
Maussan, who has been linked to discredited alien theories in the past, testified under oath in September, saying, “These specimens are not a part of our terrestrial evolutionary process… They are not beings that were found after a UFO crash.”
‘They were found in diatom [algae] mines and were later fossilized.’
He later added: ‘Whether they are aliens or not, we don’t know, but they were intelligent and they lived with us. They should rewrite history.’
‘We are not alone in this vast universe, we should embrace this reality,’ he said at the event.’
The bodies showcased at the congressional session had a generally humanoid shape but featured a retractable neck and elongated skulls that exhibited characteristics more akin to those of birds, as reported by El País. Presenters also noted in September that the bodies had lightweight, robust bones, lacked teeth, and were visibly equipped with three fingers. Maussan claimed that carbon dating conducted by the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) after the initial presentation dated the bodies to be over 1,000 years old.
However, it’s worth mentioning that in 2017, Maussan made similar claims in Peru, and a report by the country’s prosecutor’s office concluded that the bodies were actually “recently manufactured dolls covered with a combination of paper and synthetic glue to simulate the appearance of skin.” The report firmly stated that these figures were almost certainly man-made and not the remains of ancient aliens as they were presented to be. It’s unclear if the bodies presented in Congress are the same as those from the 2017 incident.
New photographs and X-rays were shared with Congress on Tuesday, with the researchers arguing that these images prove that ‘they are real’.The specialists also pointed out that the bodies contained hybrid DNA.
Jaime Maussan said, ‘We have a hybrid being, we have other beings that are apparently more evolved than us…we are facing something truly extraordinary’. While Mausaan and his team declared the corpses, named Clara and Mauricio, ‘are real,’ but the experts did not have anything to substantiate their origin and they did not imply the bodies were ‘extraterrestrial.’
During the session on Tuesday, Maussan concentrated on demonstrating the authenticity of the bodies by presenting insights from medical experts.
‘None of the scientists say [the study results] prove that they are extraterrestrials, but I go further,’ Maussan said, suggesting that they could be evidence of extraterrestrial life forms.
Maussan brought a team of medical experts who delivered a letter signed by 11 researchers from San Luis Gonzaga National University in Ica, Peru, affirming the same conclusion.
Anthropologist Roger Zuniga of San Luis Gonzaga National University in Ica Peru said, ‘There was absolutely no human intervention in the physical and biological formation of these beings.’ Nonetheless, the letter explicitly stated that the team was not suggesting that the bodies were ‘extraterrestrial’ but did not provide information on the origins of the remains.
Argentine surgeon Celestino Adolfo Piotto asserted that he had examined the test results on the bodies and made the unusual argument that ‘they were an evolved version of today’s human beings, calling them ‘our descendants.’
While Maussan remained firm in his claims, the presentation faced criticism from numerous experts who dismissed it as a publicity stunt. These experts referred to previous studies of such remains, which were determined to be crafted from animal and human bones. When questioned about these studies, Zuniga suggested that those specimens were likely fake. However, he reiterated that he and other researchers at the university had examined similar specimens, which they believed to be authentic. During the second forum on extraterrestrial life, legislator Cynthia López (PRI) expressed her indignation at the ‘spectacle’ in Congress.
‘We see Jaime Maussan here in the Chamber of Deputies. Sir, we are discussing the budget; it is not for you to come and do your lies and your things,’ López said. ‘This is the people’s house; we are discussing the budget. They haven’t given a single peso to Acapulco, and you are visiting here. We do not want Jaime Maussan in the Chamber of Deputies. Jaime Maussan out with his lies, there are priorities in the Chamber of Deputies, which is the budget for Acapulco.’
In September, Maussan and some Mexican lawmakers became the target of international mockery when he unveiled two boxes containing what were claimed to be mummies discovered in Peru. The researchers made extravagant assertions that the bodies, presented in transparent boxes and reportedly recovered from Cusco in Peru, were not connected to ‘our earthly evolution,’ and that 30 percent of their genetic makeup remained ‘unknown,’ as reported by Mexican media.
Maussan, who has been linked to discredited alien theories in the past, testified under oath in September, saying, “These specimens are not a part of our terrestrial evolutionary process… They are not beings that were found after a UFO crash.”
‘They were found in diatom [algae] mines and were later fossilized.’
He later added: ‘Whether they are aliens or not, we don’t know, but they were intelligent and they lived with us. They should rewrite history.’
‘We are not alone in this vast universe, we should embrace this reality,’ he said at the event.’
The bodies showcased at the congressional session had a generally humanoid shape but featured a retractable neck and elongated skulls that exhibited characteristics more akin to those of birds, as reported by El País. Presenters also noted in September that the bodies had lightweight, robust bones, lacked teeth, and were visibly equipped with three fingers. Maussan claimed that carbon dating conducted by the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) after the initial presentation dated the bodies to be over 1,000 years old.
However, it’s worth mentioning that in 2017, Maussan made similar claims in Peru, and a report by the country’s prosecutor’s office concluded that the bodies were actually “recently manufactured dolls covered with a combination of paper and synthetic glue to simulate the appearance of skin.” The report firmly stated that these figures were almost certainly man-made and not the remains of ancient aliens as they were presented to be. It’s unclear if the bodies presented in Congress are the same as those from the 2017 incident.
